Dr. Philip McMillan,  John McMillan

At 4 a.m. one Wednesday, Dr. Philip McMillan, a clinician and researcher, was awakened by an urgent call from a confidante at the other end of the world. The call concerned 6,000 pages of documents linking the Covid-19 virus to Cold War bioweapon programs involving the Soviet Union, United States, and China, materials purportedly explaining “the full pandemic from start to finish.” These documents were allegedly obtained through data mining by a global network of independent scientists investigating COVID-19 who had accessed restricted databases. The findings were described as “truly horrific” and worse than anticipated. If verified, this information would fundamentally change our understanding of the pandemic’s origins and potentially transform treatments for millions.

Historical Context: Three Powers, One Virus

The foundation of this story begins nearly a century ago. In 1922, from the ashes of the Russian Empire emerged the Soviet Union, a nation that would pioneer biological warfare on an unprecedented scale. After Lenin’s death in 1924, Joseph Stalin enforced brutal policies and launched a covert bioweapons program disguised as civilian research. By the 1930s, Soviet scientists were already experimenting with anthrax and, notably, clotting agents and fibrinolysis disruptors—bioweapons designed to cause fatal clots or unstoppable bleeding.

By the 1970s, Soviet labs had developed toxins that induced hypercoagulation, a dangerous thickening of blood, or catastrophic bleeding. Facilities like Stepnogorsk produced anthrax en masse while continuing research on clotting mechanisms. Though the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, its research persisted through defectors and covert exchanges.

As Soviet power waned, the United States advanced its own bioweapons agenda. DARPA, in the 1990s and 2000s, manipulated viral genes to enhance stealth and virulence. Projects targeting ORF3A, ORF6, and ORF8—genes that suppress immune responses—were detailed in declassified records.

China’s bioweapons program, active since the 1980s, formed the third strand of this narrative. By the 1990s and 2000s, evidence allegedly shows a sophisticated effort at the Wuhan Institute of Virology focusing on genetic manipulation of coronaviruses. Documents suggest China engineered three additional ORFs critical to SARS-CoV-2: ORF11, ORF19, and ORF29. These specialized genetic sequences reportedly enabled enhanced viral transmission in human cells and more severe disease progression—capabilities that would later become hallmarks of COVID-19.

The threads converged in the early 2000s. Soviet expertise in bioweapons shared through defectors informed American efforts at DARPA. US-China scientific collaborations, documented in joint research grants and NIH funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, bridged the final gap. Leaked documents link the institute to military objectives, suggesting a fusion of Soviet-inspired clotting mechanisms, American evasion tactics, and Chinese precision. These connections, while individually concerning, paint a more disturbing picture when viewed together.

Understanding ORF Proteins

To grasp the significance of these claims, we must understand what ORF proteins are and why they matter. ORF stands for “Open Reading Frame”—segments of viral genetic code that direct viral replication and translate into proteins. In normal viruses, these proteins perform various functions essential to viral replication and pathogenicity.

The coronavirus genome is remarkably long, with 29,675 nucleotides coding for numerous proteins. Structural proteins like the spike and nucleocapsid enable infection and viral assembly, while non-structural ORF proteins disrupt normal cell function.

Among these are several ORF proteins, including ORF1A and ORF1B, which make non-structural proteins helping the virus replicate more effectively. Then there’s the spike protein, followed by the envelope protein and other ORFs: 3A, 3D, 6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9B, and the nucleocapsid protein.

But it’s ORF10, a gene tied to hyperphosphorylated fibrinogen (a modified blood protein implicated in severe COVID-19 clotting), that has captured particular attention. “This is not part of any other coronavirus,” notes one researcher who has studied the documents. “They don’t know why it’s there, they don’t know what function it has, it’s just there.” Scientists initially wondered if it was merely a nonsense mutation with no particular role.

The data, however, suggest something more deliberate. According to the recovered information, ORF10 appears to have originated from Soviet-era bioweapons research, specifically from programs focused on developing clotting agents. The genetic sequence was reportedly refined by Chinese military scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who integrated this Soviet technology with their own advanced gain-of-function research.

The scientists examining these documents believe ORF10 is “one of the major drivers for abnormal clotting” and may have been intentionally designed “as to how to make the human blood coagulate.” Their analysis suggests the integration of this modified gene was a deliberate effort to enhance the virus’s ability to cause systemic damage through coagulation disorders—a hallmark of severe COVID-19 cases that puzzled clinicians worldwide.

Meanwhile, other engineered ORFs allegedly played complementary roles. ORF3A inhibits autophagy, enhancing viral persistence. ORF6 suppresses interferon responses, aiding immune evasion. ORF8 modulates the immune system and controls apoptosis. ORF11 enhances viral entry into human cells. ORF19 amplifies viral replication. ORF29 modulates host inflammatory responses to exacerbate disease severity.

Together, these engineered components—Soviet clotting agents, American ORFs enhancing evasion, and Chinese ORFs amplifying infectivity and severity—have allegedly converged into a single virus. This combination explains many of COVID-19’s unusual clinical presentations.

The Evidence: Codes, Documents, and Whistleblowers

The leaked documents required custom software to decrypt and reportedly took months of collaborative work across multiple countries, with scientists working anonymously to protect themselves from potential retaliation. The decryption process itself was a technical challenge of significant magnitude.

The decrypted files revealed timelines of viral engineering, gene patents, lab records, leaked correspondence, and genetic analyses revealing SARS-CoV-2 as the culmination of Soviet, American, and Chinese contributions. One document reportedly outlines a detailed molecular pathway for how ORF10 disrupts normal clotting mechanisms—matching the clinical observations in severe COVID cases.

These revelations are already attracting attention from multiple U.S. senators and international medical associations seeking access to the original documents. “The Unholy Triad, the Birth of a Plague” report is based on the information disclosed and outlines connections between global powers and bioweapons research.

The scientists involved, a consortium of experts from various fields including virology, epidemiology, and biodefense, have anticipated repercussions. To protect themselves, they’ve established secure channels to disseminate their findings automatically if any team member experiences unexplained difficulties or disappearances. They suggest the virus, bearing the engineered ORFs, emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, though whether its release was accidental or deliberate remains unclear. Dr. McMillan credits the unnamed scientists for persisting despite risks: “Without their refusal to stop digging, we’d still be in the dark.”

Beyond Politics: A Medical Imperative

For some, these revelations may be “purely just political.” But for clinicians treating COVID-19 patients, the implications transcend politics. Understanding SARS-CoV-2’s engineered genes could revolutionize treatment.

Anticoagulants targeting ORF10’s clotting mechanisms could potentially address the perplexing blood disorders in severe cases. Immune-boosting therapies countering ORF6’s suppression of interferons might help restore natural defenses. Novel approaches targeting ORF8’s immunomodulatory effects could balance inflammatory responses. Each engineered component suggests a specific therapeutic counteraction.

However, progress hinges on accountability. Dr. McMillan stresses that global health organizations must audit labs, declassify research, and fund targeted therapies. “We can’t treat what we don’t comprehend,” he argues, urging public demand for oversight akin to initiatives highlighted by civil society groups.

“These are essentially very, very dark times,” concludes Dr. McMillan. “This truth should shock you, and you haven’t even seen the whole of it. When you realize just how deep and how far this goes, you’ll realize what we’re up against.”

The pandemic’s origins are no accident but the culmination of decades of reckless science and secrecy. For those suffering from long COVID or clotting disorders, answers are a matter of survival. As Dr. McMillan states, “Transparency isn’t optional—it’s the only path forward.” Staying informed through credible scientific networks remains critical as new therapies and evidence emerge.

.